Banner
WorkflowNavbar

Regulating political funding: Rules around the world, India's challenge

Regulating political funding: Rules around the world, India's challenge
Contact Counsellor

Regulating political funding: Rules around the world, India's challenge

  • Recently, the SC delivered a comprehensive judgement on the Electoral Bonds case.
  • It addressed the intersection of money and politics in India's democracy.

The Judgement

  • The judgement focused on two primary issues raised by the petitions
    • The impact of unlimited corporate funding on free and fair elections
    • The violation of citizens' right to information due to non-disclosure of contributions.

Significance of Party Funding

  • Unlike the US, where elections centre around individual candidates, India's parliamentary system places parties at the core of electoral politics.
  • Therefore, any effective campaign finance framework must primarily address party funding, rather than individual candidates.

Key Aspects of a Fruitful Party Funding Framework

  • The judgement outlined four crucial aspects for an effective party funding framework.
  1. Regulation of Donations
  • Restrictions on who can donate and limits on donation amounts aim to prevent parties from being dominated by a few large donors.
  1. Limits on Expenditure
  • Imposing expenditure limits on political parties prevents a financial arms race.
  • It ensures that parties compete for votes rather than money.
  1. Public Financing of Elections
  • Public funding based on predetermined criteria can help reduce reliance on private funding.
  • such as past electoral performance, membership fees, and private donations
  • Disclosure Requirements
  • Mandating the disclosure of donations nudges voters against electing politicians engaged in quid pro quo arrangements.

Challenges and Solutions

  • The judgement discussed various challenges in implementing an effective party funding framework.
  • These include balancing transparency and anonymity, and preventing quid pro quo arrangements.
  • It highlighted the Chilean experiment with "complete anonymity" of party funding.
    • It ultimately failed due to coordination between politicians and donors.

Balancing Transparency and Anonymity

  • Many jurisdictions strike a balance by allowing anonymity for small donors while requiring disclosures for large donations.
  • India's current framework lacks donation limits for individuals and legal expenditure limits for parties.
  • This allows large donors to hide their contributions through schemes like Electoral Bonds.

Evolution of Political Funding

  • The judgement emphasised the evolving nature of political funding, noting the increasing involvement of third-party entities in campaign activities.
  • This necessitates a reevaluation of traditional assumptions about political funding frameworks in India.

Categories