Banner
WorkflowNavbar

Contact Counsellor

Ram Charan & Ors. vs. Sukhram & Ors

Significance: Landmark SC verdict advancing gender justice in tribal inheritance rights.

1. Key Highlights of Judgment

AspectDetails
Core IssueDenial of inheritance to tribal women based on "customary law"
Constitutional ViolationExclusion violates Articles 14 (equality), 15 (non-discrimination)
InterpretationRead with Articles 38 (social justice) & 46 (protect tribal interests) → Gender equality is constitutional ethos
HSA 1956 ApplicabilityThough Hindu Succession Act does not apply to Scheduled Tribes, absence of law ≠ automatic exclusion of women
Judicial ApproachApply justice, equity, and good conscience if no proven custom bars female inheritance
Precedents CitedMst. Sarwango v. Mst. Urchamahin (2013): Inheritance to daughters based on equity Tirith Kumar v. Daduram (2024): Affirmed tribal women's property rights

2. Evolution of Tribal Women's Inheritance Rights

  • Traditional customs often discriminatory
  • Rights reaffirmed via Constitution (Art. 14, 15)
  • Impetus from Article 46 (state duty to protect tribal interests)
  • Burden of proof on those claiming "customary bar"
  • Absence of statute → Courts apply equity
  • Landmark shift from Madhu Kishwar v. Bihar (1996) which upheld tribal male-only inheritance

3. Custom as a Source of Law

AspectDetails
DefinitionUnwritten practices gaining legal force through long usage & recognition
Essential ConditionsAncient, continuous, reasonable, not immoral/opposed to public policy
Judicial ScrutinyCustoms violating fundamental rights (Art. 13) are void
Regressive ExamplesSati, child marriage, triple talaq (struck down in Shayara Bano v. UoI, 2017)
Tribal ContextProtected under Fifth Schedule but subject to constitutional morality

**Current Affairs **

  • PESA Act 1996: Empowers tribal self-governance but must align with FRs.
  • Recent Step: Verdict pushes states to reform inheritance rules in Fifth Schedule areas.
  • Data: STs constitute 8.6% of India’s population (2011 Census); 45% are women.

Categories