Banner
WorkflowNavbar

Raising judges' retirement age on performance not practical: Govt to panel

Raising judges' retirement age on performance not practical: Govt to panel
Contact Counsellor

Raising judges' retirement age on performance not practical: Govt to panel

  • The government recently opposed the suggestion to extend the retirement age of Supreme Court and High Court judges based on performance appraisal.

Committee Recommendation

  • In August last year, the Standing Committee on Law and Personnel in its report on ‘Judicial Processes and their Reforms’ proposed a performance-based tenure extension system for judges beyond the current retirement age.
  • It suggested assessing judges' performance considering factors like health, quality, and quantity of judgments before extending their tenure.
    • According to constitutional provisions, Supreme Court judges retire at the age of 65 years, while judges of the high courts retire at 62.

Government's Response

  • The government disagrees with the recommendation, stating it might not be practical and may result in “undue favouritism”.
  • It will further erode the powers of Parliament and empower the Judiciary through the Supreme Court Collegium (SCC) to take decisions on the enhancement of age.
  • Performance-based evaluations may lead to favouritism and susceptibility to external pressures, compromising judicial impartiality.
  • This would also strain limited resources in the judiciary and executive involved in the appointment process.

Prelims Takeaway

  • Supreme Court Collegium (SCC)
  • Retirement of Judges

Categories