1. Introduction & Objective
- Purpose: Reform governance of National Sports Federations (NSFs) including BCCI.
- Core Shift: Ministry moves from "controller" → "facilitator" role.
- Goals:
- Streamline oversight & transparency
- Ensure athlete welfare
- Reduce litigation
- Align with global standards (e.g., IOC)
2. Key Bodies & Functions
| Body | Role | Key Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| National Sports Board (NSB) | • Recognizes/suspends NSFs• Monitors compliance & elections• Oversight of BCCI | Appointed by Central Govt. |
| National Sports Tribunal (NST) | • Resolves NSF disputes (elections/selection)• Headed by SC judge | Excludes:- Games-time disputes- Doping cases (NADA)- International federation matters |
3. Major Changes for BCCI
| Aspect | Current Status | Post-Bill Status |
|---|---|---|
| Recognition | Autonomous (TN Societies Act) | Requires NSB recognition |
| Accountability | Not under RTI Act | Subject to RTI Act |
| Dispute Resolution | Self-managed/courts | Mandatory referral to NST |
4. Athlete-Centric Reforms
- Athlete representation in NSF administration.
- Transparent selection processes & rights protection.
- Age Norms: Upper age cap for administrators raised from 70 → 75 years (IOC-aligned).
- Strict anti-doping enforcement via NADA.
5. Rationale
- 300+ pending cases against Sports Ministry.
- Global credibility for India’s 2036 Olympics bid & T20 Cricket in LA 2028.
- BCCI’s historic resistance to oversight despite financial independence.