Golden Dome: Space Defense & Implications
- Golden Dome (2025): $175-billion U.S. space-based missile shield using satellite interceptors (kinetic/directed-energy weapons).
- Legal Challenge:
- Outer Space Treaty (OST), 1967 (Article IV):
- Bans WMDs in space.
- Allows conventional weapons (loophole exploited by Golden Dome).
- Mandates "exclusively peaceful purposes" on celestial bodies.
- PAROS Treaty: UN resolutions oppose space arms race (non-binding).
- Outer Space Treaty (OST), 1967 (Article IV):
- Risks:
- Dual-use ambiguity: Interceptors can target missiles or enemy satellites (ASAT capability).
- Erodes mutual deterrence → Space arms race → Debris/instability.
- Weakens OST → Space becomes "legal grey zone."
- India's Dilemma:
- Strategic partner in space situational awareness with U.S.
- Conflicts with India’s advocacy for demilitarized space (PAROS supporter, Global South leader).
- Impacts pending Space Activities Bill (dual-use tech, treaty compliance).
- Current Affairs:
- U.S.-China/Russia tensions over space weapons (2023-25).
- PAROS Resolution 76/231 (2021): Demands binding space arms control.
PYQs & Linkage
- Mains 2019 (GS-III): "Discuss strategic implications of space militarization."
- Mains 2013 (GS-II): "Critically examine outdated space laws."

