Banner
WorkflowNavbar

Affluent sub-castes among backward classes may be excluded from quota list, observes Supreme Court

Affluent sub-castes among backward classes may be excluded from quota list, observes Supreme Court
Contact Counsellor

Affluent sub-castes among backward classes may be excluded from quota list, observes Supreme Court

  • A seven-judge Constitution Bench questioned why affluent sub-castes among backward classes should not be “excluded” from the reservation list.
  • The court observed that these castes should be made to compete with the general category.

Observations of the Court

  • These advanced sub-castes could exit the domain of reservation to make room for sub-castes who were relatively more marginalised or most backward.
  • The court interpreted that exclusion implicit in reservation.
  • The ‘forwards’ among ‘backwards' should make ground for the marginalised.
  • This will lead the nation to the substantive equality and not formal equality,
  • States can identify and sub-classify groups within the Scheduled Caste (SC) category who deserve greater reservation.

The Case of Punjab Government on Reservation

  • The Punjab government is defending its law that sub-classifies groups within the Scheduled Caste (SC) category to provide greater reservation.
  • Punjab argues that states have the authority to identify sub-castes within SCs and grant them more reservation based on their level of marginalization.
  • This power of the President of India does not take away the power of the States
    • To identify more backward sub-castes or groups among them who require special attention and benefits.
  • The State defends the validity of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act of 2006.
  • The act gives preference to specific sub-groups within the SC category. This provision was initially struck down by the State High Court based on a previous Supreme Court judgment.
  • However, Punjab argues that sub-classification aids equality by targeting the most marginalized within the SC community.
  • The state emphasizes that its goal is inclusivity and ensuring benefits reach all backward groups.
  • The debate includes discussions on
    • Whether reservation leads to exclusion
    • The efficiency of government
    • The varying degrees of marginalization within backward communities.
  • The Supreme Court bench is considering these arguments regarding the constitutionality and effectiveness of sub-classification within reservation policies.
  • The President, under Articles 341 and 342, has designated castes and tribes for the entire nation.

Prelims Takeaway

  • Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act of 2006.
  • Article 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India
  • Indira Sawhney v Union of India

Categories